Points From
Two Pueblo Sites in Southwestern
Colorado
by
Bruce Bradley
December 2000
Over the past three decades I have been doing research on a Pueblo
site not far from Cortez, Colorado.
Initially, I worked with permission of the land owner, but was eventually able
to purchase the property. I excavated in spare time in the summer and did
analysis when I could, mostly in the winter. The site, Wallace Ruin, turned out
to be a special place, one of the few sites in Colorado
identified as a Chaco outlier. These are Pueblos
that were built during the Pueblo II period (A.D. 900-1150) that were probably
ceremonial/administrative centers, and part of the
civilization centered in Chaco Canyon
in northwestern New Mexico. Of
special interest to me is the large number of points that have come from
Wallace Ruin. Although the site dates from around A.D. 1040-1280, some of the
points are from earlier times. Unlike other pueblo sites I am familiar with,
there is also evidence that points were being made there.
Also, I have had the great privilege of being in charge of research at a Pueblo
I through Pueblo II site in southwestern Colorado
for the past three years. The site, Stix and Leaves Pueblo, is privately owned
and all of the work has been sponsored by the land owners, Nick and Anh Fergis. Although their real
love is finding arrowheads, they recognize the importance of what can be
learned through archaeology, and have committed themselves to sponsoring
professional research at the site. If I were to select any type of site to find
arrowheads, it probably wouldn't be an Anasazi
Pueblo. They are notorious for not containing many projectile points. Happily,
this is not the case at Stix and Leaves Pueblo. The site has three occupations,
Late Pueblo I (A.D. 850-875), Early Pueblo II (A.D. 949-970), and Middle Pueblo
II (A.D. 1054-1075). We have excavated 50 rooms, four kivas, two pithouses, and the courtyard areas in between. Several of
the kivas and pithouses were filled with trash.
Virtually everywhere we have found projectile points, manufacture discards,
and of course the flakes from their manufacture. Along with Wallace Ruin, point
styles are not restricted to the time periods of occupation. We have found
Early and Middle Archaic points (Figure 1), Basketmaker II and III
points (Figure 2) and points from all three Pueblo
periods (Figure 3). These images only show a
small sample of the points, but they represent the various types as I know
them. I believe it is possible not only to define point styles in the larger Pueblo
time periods (such as Pueblo II that lasted for 250 years), but see changes
within them. Of particular interest is the presence of atlatl
dart points in Pueblo I, coexisting
with arrow points. This is curious because the atlatl
seems to be absent from the preceding Basketmaker III
times.
What the manufacture artifacts show is that arrowheads were being made with
two different approaches. One is the expected pressure flaking on thin flake
blanks (Figure 4). This is fairly standard for
small points throughout North America. The other method
is not usual, although I have suspected it for a long time. This is initial
percussion shaping and thinning followed by pressure retouch (Figure 5). It is extraordinary because of the small
size of many of the points made this way. A flake blank or chunk was thinned by
striking hinge fracture flakes from one edge and then clearing them off from
the other edge. It is also evident that edges were beveled for platform
preparation, but individual platforms were not isolated and edge grinding was
minimal or absent. The result was a lot of manufacture breaks of the sort
usually seen with larger pieces (Figure 6).
I have managed to reproduce this process using a small coarse sandstone
pebble, but it is tricky. There are also some small antler
pins (Figure 7) that I suspect may have been
used as punches. Split breaks on
the ends are just like what I get with larger antler punches used for biface
flaking. The favorite stones used for points at these sites were local Dakota
quartzite and a silicified conglomerate from the
Burro Canyon Formation. There are also a lot of imported stones ranging from Utah
agates, to petrified wood and obsidian from New Mexico.
There is also clear evidence that some pieces were heat treated.
Along with the normal arrowheads, we have found a few special pieces that we
call eccentrics (Figure 8). In some cases, these
are arrowheads that have been elaborated with serrations and are made from
exotic agates. In other cases, the pieces are small free-form specimens that
one's imagination can make into small animals, insects, etc.
There are also examples of arrowheads that have been broken and reworked for
reuse. The most obvious of these are the ones that broke through the stem, at
the notches, and were simply renotched (Figure 9). In all cases we have found so far,
reworking for use as projectile points has only been done with points of the
maker's own time period. Earlier points are not reworked for use (other than
perhaps as ornaments, for example the renotched
Mallory point in Figure 1). I know that Pueblo
people collect old projectile points for ritual use, and this seems to have
been a practice since early times. Arrowhead collecting is not only a modern
phenomenon!
All in all, it is really exciting to finally get good evidence for both Anasazi point types and the technology of their
manufacture. It is also curious that points were being made at Stix and Leaves
Pueblo during all three occupations, but not at any other sites in the
vicinity. Other than Wallace Ruin, I know of just one other Pueblo
site where it looks like points were being made in quantity, an
it is way north on the Utah
border. This evidence may make us think again about our conclusion that Anasazi folks made there own tools and produced their own
food, at the family or, at most, the clan level. It also may indicate that
certain sites were designated, either through decision or tradition, as the
places where arrowheads were made. I'm not willing yet to see this as an
example of craft specialization as an economic undertaking, but see it possibly
related to specialized ritual functions at certain villages.
Back to main page www.primtech.net.